반응형

[ITQ 엑셀] 20 11회 실전모의고사(모든 작업강좌)



만족하시면, 잊지 마세용ㅇㅇㅇ






반응형
반응형

 

 

39. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳은?

 

It is important, however, that the subject be unaware that he is being observed.

 

 One method for studying behavior is to observe and record events as they naturally occur in life. (①) Researchers who use this method, called naturalistic observation, do not bring their subjects into the laboratory and manipulate their behavior in any way. (②) Nor do they select group of subjects and set up different experimental conditions. (③) Naturalistic observation is frequently used to study animal behavior, such as the hibernation habits of bears or the maternal behavior of hens. (④) For example, a psychologist using naturalistic observation to study how children of different races play together would watch groups of children playing in the school yards or parks, but he would keep himself at a distance so as not to be detected. (⑤) If the children were aware that a strange adult was watching, they might behave differently than they ordinarily would.

- Analysis -

 

   It is important, however, that the subject be unaware that he is being observed. (그러나 중요한 것은 피 실험자는 자신이 관찰되고 있다는 것을 깨닫지 못해야 한다는 것이다)

 

One method for studying behavior (행동을 연구하는 한 가지 방법은) is to observe and record events ( ~ 사건을 관찰하고 기록하는 것이다) as they naturally occur in life (그들이 자연적으로 생활에서 일어나는 것처럼). (①) Researchers who use this method ( ~ 이 방식을 사용하는 연구원들은), called naturalistic observation (자연주의자적인 관찰이라 하는), do not bring their subjects into the laboratory (그들의 피 실험자들을 실험실로 데려 오지도 않고) and manipulate their behavior in any way (어떠한 방식에서도 그들의 행동을 조정하지도 않는다). (②) Nor do they select group of subjects (또한 그들은 피 실험자들의 집단을 선택하지도 않으며) and set up different experimental conditions (다른 실험적 상황을 설정하지도 않는다). (③) Naturalistic observation is frequently used to study animal behavior (자연주의자적인 관찰은 ~ 동물행동을 연구하는데 종종 사용된다), such as the hibernation habits of bears (곰의 동면의 습관) or the maternal behavior of hens (암탉의 모성애적인 행동과 같은). () For example (예를 들어), a psychologist using naturalistic observation to study how children of different races play together (어떻게 다른 인종의 아이들이 함께 노는지를 연구하기 위해 자연주의자적인 관찰을 사용하는 심리학자는) would watch groups of children playing in the school yards or parks (운동장이나 공원에서 노는 아이들의 집단을 관찰할 것이다), but he would keep himself at a distance so as not to be detected (하지만 그는 눈에 띄지 않기 위해 자신을 멀리할 것이다). (⑤) If the children were aware that a strange adult was watching (만일 아이들이 낮선 어른이 지켜보이 있다는 것을 알아챈다면), they might behave differently than they ordinarily would (그들이 본래 행동하고 싶은 것과 다르게 행동할지 모른다).

반응형
반응형

 

 

38. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은?

   Changing lightbulbs to get the right level of illumination is inconvenient and possibly dangerous. Unscrewing a bulb that has been on for some time often lead to burned fingers.

 

(A) The lamp has a 40-watt bulb in one of the three sockets and 60-watt bulbs in the other two sockets. Using the lamp, we can have a choice of 40, 60, 100, 120, or 160 watts' worth of illumination by switching on one, two, or all three of the bulbs.

 

(B) Even if it can be unscrewed, it very well may crash-land, producing a mess of sharp edges. Given this scenario, most of us might settle for a compromise: to put a 100-watt bulb in the lamp and leave it, accepting the room being a bit too bright for watching television and a bit too dim for dim for reading.

 

(C) But of such situations, inventions are born. Wouldn't it be nice if the same lamp could provide different degrees of illumination at different times? Out of such a question might have come the design for a lamp with three sockets.

① (A) - (C) - (B)   ② (B) - (A) - (C)

③ (B) - (C) - (A)  ④ (C) - (A) - (B)

⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

 

Changing lightbulbs to get the right level of illumination (올바른 수준의 조명을 얻기 위해 전구를 바꾸는 것은) is inconvenient and possibly dangerous (불편하고 아무 위험하다). Unscrewing a bulb that has been on for some time often (얼마동안 조여져 있던 전구의 나사를 푸는 것은) lead to burned fingers (손가락 화상을 입을 수 있다).

 

(A) The lamp has a 40-watt bulb in one of the three sockets (그 램프는 3개의 소켓 중 하나에는 40와트 전구 한 개를) and 60-watt bulbs in the other two sockets (다른 두 개의 소켓에는 60와트 전구 2개가 있다). Using the lamp (그 램프를 사용하기 것으로), we can have a choice of 40, 60, 100, 120, or 160 watts' worth of illumination (우리는 40, 60, 100, 120 또는 160와트의 조명 전구를 달을 수 있다) by switching on one, two, or all three of the bulbs (한개, 두 개 또는 세게 모두를 교체하는 것으로).

 

(B) Even if it can be unscrewed (비록 그것은 나사를 돌리지 않을 수 있을지라도), it very well may crash-land (그것은 아마도 바닥으로 떨어질 수 있어서), producing a mess of sharp edges (날카로운 조각의 엉망을 낳을 수 있다). Given this scenario (이런 상황을 고려할 때), most of us might settle for a compromise (대부분의 우리들은 타협점을 찾으려할지 모른다): to put a 100-watt bulb in the lamp and leave it (그 램프에 100와트 전구 한 개를 끼우고 그대로 위해), accepting the room being a bit too bright for watching television and a bit too dim for dim for reading (TV 시청을 위해 약간 밝고 책을 읽기 위해서 약간 어두운 방을 받아들이는 것으로).

 

(C) But of such situations, inventions are born (그러한 상황에서 발명품은 탄생한다). Wouldn't it be nice (좋지 않을까) if the same lamp could provide different degrees of illumination at different times (만일 같은 램프가 다른 시간에도 다른 정도의 조명을 제공할 수 있다면)? Out of such a question might have come the design for a lamp with three sockets (그러한 질문으로부터 세 개의 소켓을 갖은 램프가 디자인되었을지 모른다).


정답 ③ (B) - (C) - (A)

 

반응형
반응형

 

 

37. 다음 글의 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

An international business negotiation serves many purposes, but one of the most significant, yet unappreciated, is that it gives each side an opportunity to learn about the other, about their businesses, and about the conditions in which they must operate. Executives engaged in making a deal are rarely in the type of competition that ends abruptly when they finish the ninth inning or the fourth quarter.   (A) , they are laying the foundation for a continuing relationship, and the successful management of that relationship depends crucially on how much they know about one another. The need for learning is particularly acute in global deal making since the parties usually come from different cultures, political systems, and business orientations. (B) , the effective global deal-maker sees a negotiation as an opportunity to learn, and the best way to learn is to visit the other side's territory to conduct the negotiations.

 

                  (A)                   (B)

① In addition ..... As a result

② In addition ..... Otherwise

③ Similarly ..... However

④ Instead ..... As a result

⑤ Instead ..... However

 

- Analysis -

 

An international business negotiation serves many purposes (국제적인 사업협상은 많은 목적에 맞지만), but one of the most significant (가장 중요한 것 중 하나는 ~ 이다), yet unappreciated(아직 인식되지 않고 있는), is that it gives each side an opportunity to learn about the other, about their businesses, and about the conditions (그것은 상대방과 그들의 사업, 그리고 그 상황에 관해 서로에게 알 기회를 준다는 것) in which they must operate (그 속에서 그들이 운영해야만 한다는). Executives engaged in making a deal (협상에 참여한 중역들은) are rarely in the type of competition (거의 ~ 상황의 종류에 있지 않다) that ends abruptly when they finish the ninth inning or the fourth quarter (그들이 9회에서 끝내거나 4쿼터에서 끝낼 때처럼 갑자기 끝나는). Instead (대신) , they are laying the foundation for a continuing relationship (그들은 계속적인 관계를 위한 토대를 마련하고 있는 것이고), and the successful management of that relationship (그 관계의 성공적인 경영진은) depends crucially on how much they know about one another (얼마나 많이 그들이 서로를 아는 것에 상당히 의존한다). The need for learning (배움의 필요성은) is particularly acute in global deal making (세계적인 거래 하는 데에 있어서 특히 중요하다) since the parties usually come from different cultures, political systems, and business orientations (양측은 대게 다른 문화와 정치적 제도 그리고 기업방향오기 때문에). As a result (결과적으로) , the effective global deal-maker sees a negotiation as an opportunity to learn (효율적인 세계 거래자들은 협상을 배움의 기회로서 간주하고), and the best way to learn (배움의 최상의 방법은) is to visit the other side's territory to conduct the negotiations (협상을 진행하기 위해 서로의 영역을 방문하는 것이다).

반응형
반응형

 

 

36. Diseases may require a minimum threshold of population size or density to support ongoing transmission of the disease. Therefore, a rise in human population size or density can expose the population to a disease that previously could not be sustained in the population. The advent of agriculture, for example, resulted in the transmission of countless disease that require higher human densities than occur in hunter-gathering societies. Malaria is an example of a massive killer that probably took on its modern killer form around five thousand years ago with the introduction of settled farming in Africa. Until settled agriculture, hunter-gathering communities in Africa were too small and sparsely settled to support the sustained transmission of malaria. Urban life similarly supports the spread of numerous disease that require higher population densities than occur in agricultural settlements. Therefore, throughout history, when societies achieved breakthroughs in farming that enabled the growth of an urban population, the initial spread of urbanization _________________________.

 

① was often set back by bouts of infectious diseases

② also gained a foothold in sustainable development

③ was widely perceived as the end of uncivilized life

④ usually provided the treatment of numerous diseases

⑤ did not necessarily mean the victory of humans over nature

 

- Analysis -

 

Diseases may require a minimum threshold of population size or density (질병은 ~ 최소한의 한계인 인구 크기나 밀집을 요구할 것 같다) to support ongoing transmission of the disease (그 질병의 진행되는 감염을 지원하기 위해). Therefore (그러므로), a rise in human population size or density (인간 인구나 밀집의 증가는) can expose the population to a disease (그 인구를 ~ 질병에 노출 시킬 수 있다) that previously could not be sustained in the population (전에는 그 인구에서 지속될 수 없었던). The advent of agriculture (농업의 출현은), for example (예를 들어), resulted in the transmission of countless disease ( ~ 수많은 질병의 감염의 결과를 낳았다) that require higher human densities (더 높은 인구밀도를 요구하는) than occur in hunter-gathering societies (사냥꾼들이 모여 사는 사회에서 일어나는 것 보다). Malaria is an example of a massive killer (말라리아는 ~ 대규모 살인자의 예이다) that probably took on its modern killer form around five thousand years ago (약 5천 년 전에 이 현대적 살인자의 형태를 아마도 갖었던) with the introduction of settled farming in Africa (아프리카에서 농업의 출현과 더불어). Until settled agriculture (농업이 정착되기까지), hunter-gathering communities in Africa (아프리카에서 사냥꾼이 모여 사는 공동체는) were too small and sparsely settled (너무나 작고 드문드문 정착하여 ~ 없었다) to support the sustained transmission of malaria (말라리아의 지속적인 감염을 지속 시킬 수). Urban life similarly supports the spread of numerous disease (도시 생활은 유사하게 ~ 수많은 질병의 감염을 지탱한다) that require higher population densities (더 높은 인구밀도를 요구하는) than occur in agricultural settlements (농업정착지에서 일어나는 것 보다). Therefore (그러므로), throughout history (역사 내내), when societies achieved breakthroughs in farming (사회가 농업에서 ~ 한 돌파구를 이루웠을 때) that enabled the growth of an urban population (어느 도시인구의 성장을 가능케 한), the initial spread of urbanization (초기의 도시화 확산은) was often set back by bouts of infectious diseases (여러 차례 전염되는 질병에 의해 저지되었다).

반응형
반응형

 

35. We complain because we derive psychological and social benefits from doing so. Sociologists and psychologists theorize that we also complain as a way of _____________________. For example, even if the cuisine at a restaurant is excellent, a person might complain that the level of the food is not up to their standards. This is a way of letting everyone who hears know that they do in fact have high standards. The complainer is saying that they are an arbiter of fine food and is implying that their refined taste is derived from any high-class dining experiences. Like Rodney Dangerfield's character in Caddyshack when he says to the waiter at the exclusive Bushwood Country Club, "Hey, tell the cook this is low-grade dog food," the complainer is saying, "I have so much sophistication, this fare doesn't impress me."

 

① correcting what is not going right

② getting attention and seeking intimacy

③ expressing excuses for our own behavior

④ making ourselves appear more discriminating

⑤ managing our anxiety and hiding our emotions

 

- Analysis -

 

We complain because we derive psychological and social benefits from doing so (우리는 그렇게 하는 것으로부터 심리적 사회적 이익을 이끌어 내려고 불평한다). Sociologists and psychologists theorize (사회학자들과 심리학자들은 이론화한다) that we also complain as a way of making ourselves appear more discriminating (우리가 자신을 더욱 차별화된 사람처럼 보이도록 만들기 위한 방법으로써 또한 불평하고 이론화한다). For example (예를 들어), even if the cuisine at a restaurant is excellent (비록 어느 음식점의 요리가 훌륭할지라도), a person might complain (누군가는 불평할지 모른다) that the level of the food is not up to their standards (그 음식의 수준이 자신의 표준에 맞지 않는다고). This is a way of letting (이것은 ~ 알리려는 방식이다) everyone who hears know that they do in fact have high standards (듣고 있는 모든 사람들에게 그들은 진정으로 사실 높은 수준을 갖고 있다는 것을 알도록). The complainer is saying (불평가들은 ~ 라 말하고 있다) that they are an arbiter of fine food (그들은 세련된 음식 심판관이고) and is implying (~을 암시하고 있는 것이다) that their refined taste is derived from any high-class dining experiences (그들의 세련된 입맛은 어떤 고급수준의 식사경험으로부터 온다는 것을). Like Rodney Dangerfield's character in Caddyshack (캐디색에 나오는 로드니 댄저필드의 등장인물처럼) when he says to the waiter at the exclusive Bushwood Country Club (독점적인 컨트리 클럽에서 그는 웨이터에게 ~ 라고 말할 때), "Hey, tell the cook this is low-grade dog food (이봐, 주방장에게 이 요리는 질이 떨어지는 개밥이야 라고 말해)," the complainer is saying (그 불평자는 ~라고 말하고 있는 것이다), “I have so much sophistication, this fare doesn't impress me.” (나는 너무나 세련된 사람이어서, 이런 요리는 나를 감동시키지 못해)".

반응형
반응형

2013년, 수능완성, 실전모의고사, 1회, P 14

 

 

34. The ultimate life force lies in tiny cellular factories of energy, called mitochondira, that burn nearly all the oxygen we breathe in. But breathing has a price. The combustion of oxygen that keeps us alive and active sends out by-products called oxygen free radicals. They have Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde characteristics. On the one hand, they help guarantee our survival. For example, when the body mobilizes to fight off infectious agents, it generates a burst of free radicals to destroy the invaders very efficiently. On the other hand, free radicals move uncontrollably through the body, attacking cells, turning their fats rancid, rusting their proteins, piercing their membranes and corrupting their genetic code until the cells become dysfunctional and sometimes give up and die. These fierce radicals, built into life as ____________________ are the potent agents of aging.

 

① either invaders or escapers

② elements to purify the mind

③ both protectors and avengers

④ undetected independent cells

⑤ antibiotics to be taken with food

 

- Analysis -

 

The ultimate life force lies in tiny cellular factories of energy (근본적인 생명력은 에너지의 미세한 세포공장에 안에 놓여 있다), called mitochondira (미토콘디라라 불리는), that burn nearly all the oxygen we breathe in (이것은 우리가 들어 마시는 모든 거의 모든 산소를 태운다). / But breathing has a price (그러나 호흡은 대가를 치른다). / The combustion of oxygen that keeps us alive and active sends out by-products called oxygen free radicals (우리를 살아 있고 움직이게 하는 산소연소는 활성산소라는 부산물을 내 보낸다). They have Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde characteristics (그들은 저킬과 하이드 박사의 특성을 갖는). On the one hand (한편으론), they help guarantee our survival (그들은 우리의 생존을 보장하는 도움을 준다). For example (예를 들어), when the body mobilizes to fight off infectious agents (신체가 감염된 병원균과 싸우고자 준비할 때), it generates a burst of free radicals to destroy the invaders very efficiently (그것은 침입자를 아주 효율적으로 파괴하기 위해 활성산소를 폭발시킨다). On the other hand (다른 한편으로), free radicals move uncontrollably through the body (활성산소은 신체 전역에서 통제할 수 없게 이동한다), attacking cells, turning their fats rancid, rusting their proteins, piercing their membranes and corrupting their genetic code (세포를 공격하고, 세포지방을 신패하게 바꾸고, 세포의 단백질을 부식 시키고, 세포의 막을 뚫고 세포의 유전자 코드를 오염 시킨다) until the cells become dysfunctional and sometimes give up and die (그 세포가 고장을 일으키게 되고 때때로 포기하여 죽을 때까지). These fierce radicals, built into life as both protectos and avengers (보호자이자 보복자로서 생명체의 이 사나운 활성산소는) are the potent agents of aging (노화의 강력한 작용제이다).

 

반응형

+ Recent posts